Boycott won’t mean job losses

letters 3Letters to the editor

It is farcical to suggest that there will be job losses as a result of Peter Dutton’s comment to boycott Woolworths.

Overall grocery purchases will not diminish by way of any boycott but will in fact increase with population growth and changing demographics.

Employers and employees will suitably adjust to meet changing demands at Woolworths and other supermarkets.

Email, Jan 20
Bob Husking, Green Point

1 Comment on "Boycott won’t mean job losses"

  1. we’ll that’s true only because it’s farsical to suggest a boycott in the first place. if indeed a boycott was successful, then of course job losses would ensue.

Comments are closed.